تم صيانة المنتدي*** لا تغير فى سياسه من سياسات المنتدى اكتب ما تريد لان هذا حقك فى الكتابه عبر عن نفسك هذه ارائك الشخصيه ونحن هنا لاظهارها
جارى تحميل صندوق البحث لمنتدى الاقباط

العودة   منتدي منظمة أقباط الولايات المتحدة > المنتدى العربى > المنتدى العام
التّسجيل الأسئلة الشائعة التقويم

المنتدى العام يهتم هذا القسم بالأخبار العامه

 
 
خيارات الموضوع طريقة العرض
Prev المشاركة السابقة   المشاركة التالية Next
  #4  
قديم 14-03-2005
saweres
GUST
 
المشاركات: n/a
I had no idea whether or not the information I had been given was true, and I never claimed that it was. But it warranted investigation. I passed it on to the Hudson County Prosecutors Office. Neither I nor my source was contacted about any of this information for three weeks after I filed the initial report. The only time I spoke to an official there, he was unfailingly polite but unmistakably condescending and clearly believed nothing that I had to tell him. From what I understand the Copt who told me all this fared little better.

Meanwhile more information was coming from other sources, including but not limited to relatives and other close friends of the victims, that seemed to corroborate what I had already been told. When Edward DeFazio was asked about all this, his answer was self-contradictory — leading me to a few more questions: Did his office make any attempt to find out if a halal butcher had really gone missing in the Jersey City area? Did they make any attempt to question the others named by the Copt? I happen to know that a reporter called one of these men and asked him what he thought of the killings. He began smoothly to speculate about robbery, drugs, etc. But when the reporter asked him about the possibility that it was a revenge killing for a religious conversion, his shock was palpable. His smooth veneer vanished and he suddenly began to sputter and search for words. Did this happen when the police questioned him? Did they question him at all? If not, was it because they had a presumption that this information was worthless on its face? If they did, on what did they base that presumption?

And one more time for Mr. Mahmoud: the information I got did not come from “hatemongers outside the state,” but from several friends and relatives of the murdered family.

These are credible witnesses who should have been called upon, yet interestingly, this is all being swept under the rug as if it never happened, and they’ve got their men now, haven’t they? No investigation needed into the Islamist angle now, heh? So no more hateful talk about the religion of peace©™, Spence.

5. If the motive was simple robbery, what are we to believe about all this? That a Copt invented the story of the death threat, and that other Copts invented the story of the conversion and revenge plot? That it was just coincidental that a couple of lowlifes happened to murder this family in the same manner in which Muslims murder blasphemers and other enemies of Islam?

I hope Edward DeFazio will be courteous enough to answer. But considering that he recently forbade a reporter even to ask him about possible religious motivation for the killings, I won’t be holding my breath.

And let’s not forget the halal butcher who fled the country after the murders took place, or the jihadis celebrating on their website afterwards. Something stinks to high heaven on this one, folks.

http://caosblog.com/archives/2005/03...ious-killings/
الرد مع إقتباس
 


عدد الأعضاء الذي يتصفحون هذا الموضوع : 1 (0 عضو و 1 ضيف)
 

قوانين المشاركة
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is متاح
كود [IMG] متاح
كود HTML غير متاح

الإنتقال السريع


جميع الأوقات بتوقيت امريكا. الساعة الآن » 07:50 PM.


Powered by: vBulletin Version 3.8.6
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.

تـعـريب » منتدي الاقباط